<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Goldman Sachs Under the Microscope</title>
	<atom:link href="http://visualeconomics.creditloan.com/goldman-sachs-under-the-microscope_2010-05-17/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://visualeconomics.creditloan.com/goldman-sachs-under-the-microscope_2010-05-17/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 10:10:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rafael</title>
		<link>http://visualeconomics.creditloan.com/goldman-sachs-under-the-microscope_2010-05-17/#comment-6409</link>
		<dc:creator>Rafael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 11:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.visualeconomics.com/?p=2946#comment-6409</guid>
		<description>You forgot to mention the full dirty history of Goldman Sachs. People forget too soon. About Goldman Sachs and Mr Maxwell business deal in the 80s? About when Goldman Sachs got fine with $110 million for providing investment analysis and underwriting? The dirty history of Goldman Sachs is huge and require a whole book to analyze all its unethical behavior but, my surprise is that I do not know why that company is still functioning and making huge amount of money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You forgot to mention the full dirty history of Goldman Sachs. People forget too soon. About Goldman Sachs and Mr Maxwell business deal in the 80s? About when Goldman Sachs got fine with $110 million for providing investment analysis and underwriting? The dirty history of Goldman Sachs is huge and require a whole book to analyze all its unethical behavior but, my surprise is that I do not know why that company is still functioning and making huge amount of money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eater</title>
		<link>http://visualeconomics.creditloan.com/goldman-sachs-under-the-microscope_2010-05-17/#comment-6410</link>
		<dc:creator>eater</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 17:38:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.visualeconomics.com/?p=2946#comment-6410</guid>
		<description>Your chart is so suggestive. You just showed that you don&#039;t knwo how to present facts. For instance. Greece. Those morons in Greece deliberately accepted the then looking favorouble money. Now they are crying. GS just created the instruments. Similar like stupid people just credit card money to spend and then start crying and blaming the moeny provider when they can&#039;t pay the debt. You sounds and seems smimilarly like one of those many left wing idiots, blending commercial wisdom of a compnay (who is in the biz just to make money) and when thinsg go wrong due to consumerism of people who just like to spend and then pointing to someone else to blame</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your chart is so suggestive. You just showed that you don&#39;t knwo how to present facts. For instance. Greece. Those morons in Greece deliberately accepted the then looking favorouble money. Now they are crying. GS just created the instruments. Similar like stupid people just credit card money to spend and then start crying and blaming the moeny provider when they can&#39;t pay the debt. You sounds and seems smimilarly like one of those many left wing idiots, blending commercial wisdom of a compnay (who is in the biz just to make money) and when thinsg go wrong due to consumerism of people who just like to spend and then pointing to someone else to blame</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Johnson</title>
		<link>http://visualeconomics.creditloan.com/goldman-sachs-under-the-microscope_2010-05-17/#comment-6411</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 09:26:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.visualeconomics.com/?p=2946#comment-6411</guid>
		<description>The diagram failed to mention that Goldman is now a bank able to borrow at the Fed window at 0% to cover any trading losses, which is hard to imagine since they are front running all Fed&#039;s trades.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The diagram failed to mention that Goldman is now a bank able to borrow at the Fed window at 0% to cover any trading losses, which is hard to imagine since they are front running all Fed&#39;s trades.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

